Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

Table 4 in A new micro-endemic species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the lowlands of Northeast India, with additional morphological notes on Cyrtodactylus khasiensis Jerdon, 1870 based on topotypical specimens from Meghalaya, India

Authors: Bohra, Sanath Chandra; Deb, Arnab; Thongni, Goldenstar; Bhattacharjee, Rupankar; Biakzuala, Lal; Lalremsanga, Hmar Tlawmte; Swargiary, Pranjal; +1 Authors

Table 4 in A new micro-endemic species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the lowlands of Northeast India, with additional morphological notes on Cyrtodactylus khasiensis Jerdon, 1870 based on topotypical specimens from Meghalaya, India

Abstract

Table 4 (continued on next two pages). Comparisons of main morphological characters amongst species that are described within the ‘Indo-Burmese khasiensis clade’ to date. Abbreviations NA = Not Available; * = Discrepancies in scale-counting methods between cited sources and current criteria. SpeciesSVL (mm)SLILPcFP/PcP (male)PcFP/ PcP (female)DTRPVT1PVT2MVSREnlarged plate-like subcaudalsDark dorsal blotches (from nape to mid-sacrum)ReferenceC. aaronbaueri54.2–69.58–118–127–80 (6–8 pitted scales)22–28NA36–3935–40no9–11 (irregular and reticulated); no mid-dorsal linePurkayastha et al. 2021C. annapurnaensis50.7 to 63.9 mm max.10–119–113–40 (3 pitted scales)18–21NA28–3532–35noDark irregular blotchesBhattarai et al. 2025C. agarwali56.4–71.89–128–1011–18NA21–25NA34–3832–39no8–9 (distinct and paired)Purkayastha et al. 2021C. aunglini68.6–81.6**12 –13NA21–26NA37–4541–47no7–8 (distinct, some paired and some unpaired)Grismer et al. 2018; Mahony & Kamei 2022C. ayeyarwadyensis62.1–71.8**10– 28NA22–24NANA32–37no9–11 (distinct and paired)Bauer 2003C. bapme69.9–77.08–128–1000 (0–13 pitted scales)21–24NA32–3730–39no7–9 (distinct and paired)Kamei & Mahony 2021C. barailensis68.89 or 129NA10 pores17NA3236noIrregular and reticulatedBoruah et al. 2024C. bengkhuaiai54.9–72.59–117–115–70 (4–5 pitted scales)22–26NA35–4137–42no7–9 (distinct and paired)Purkayastha et al. 2021C. brevidactylus71.4–88.010–1210–1188 pores27–30NA38–4235–46no3–4 large, dark dorsal blotches between nape and sacrumBauer 2002, Grismer et al. 2018C. cayuensis59.4–83.68–138–126–107–10 pores15–26NA27–3828–44no8–10 regular as well as irregular blotchesMirza et al. 2021; Boruah et al. 2024C. chrysopylos64.9–83.8**8–13016–20NA30–3539–55no6–8, unpaired and transverseBauer 2002; Grismer et al. 2018C. dianxiensis73.8–79.99–128–117–8017–19NA31 or 32 35–41no9–10, paired and distinctLiu and Rao 2021; Zhang et al. 2024C. exercitus48.1–68.09–119–1011–150 (11 pitted scales)21–24NA32–3435–37noIrregularPurkayastha et al. 2022C. gansi46.5–62.4**16–2913+1 pores20–25NANA36–40no10 (distinct, transverse and unpaired)Bauer 2003

Published as part of Bohra, Sanath Chandra, Deb, Arnab, Thongni, Goldenstar, Bhattacharjee, Rupankar, Biakzuala, Lal, Lalremsanga, Hmar Tlawmte, Swargiary, Pranjal & Roy, Rita, 2026, A new micro-endemic species of Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the lowlands of Northeast India, with additional morphological notes on Cyrtodactylus khasiensis Jerdon, 1870 based on topotypical specimens from Meghalaya, India, pp. 291 in European Journal of Taxonomy 1048 on page 291, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2026.1048.3255, http://zenodo.org/record/19663029

Related Organizations
Keywords

Biodiversity, Taxonomy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average