Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Comparison on reflection/transmission coefficient

Authors: Sakarya, Handan; Sibonjic, Osman; Berginc, Marko;

Comparison on reflection/transmission coefficient

Abstract

A comparison on scattering coefficients with Type N connectors was planned among the partners of the EPM (European Partnership on Metrology) project. This inter-laboratory comparison exercise was part of the project “Development of RF and Microwave Metrology Capability II” (22RPT04 ‘RFMicrowave2’), under Work Package (WP) 1.3 titled “Reflection and transmission coefficients (S-parameters) and attenuation measurement”. The comparison was planned for three participants (TÜBİTAK UME, IMBIH and SIQ) involved in WP 1.3 of “22RPT04 RFMicrowave2” Project. The comparison was conducted in accordance with the Technical Protocol prepared by TÜBİTAK UME and approved by the participants. SPARK provided the attenuator for the comparison. The comparison was carried out by measuring the S-parameters at eight frequencies which were 50 MHz, 500 MHz, 1 GHz, 2 GHz, 3 GHz, 10 GHz, 15 GHz, and 18 GHz. IMBIH and TÜBİTAK was responsible for analyzing and reporting the results of the comparison, respectively.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average