This case study examines Tracy Tafirenyika's public-interest journalism in Namibia as a case study in econopolitics, investigative reporting, public accountability, political economy, and gendered risk. It argues that her work is analytically significant not only because of the events it reports but also because of the way it translates policy contradictions, hidden transactions, development claims, and institutional pressures into public knowledge. Using qualitative document analysis of a bounded public corpus of her reporting in The Namibian and The Namibian Investigation Unit together with selected institutional material on Namibia's media environment, access to information, whistleblower protection, journalist safety, and digital governance, the study identifies recurring dimensions of her journalism: exposing hidden or normalized harm; centering communities in extractive-development disputes; scrutinizing land, migration, and belonging; examining public enterprises and investment-promotion governance; and situating public-interest reporting within gendered digital risk. The Namibian case shows that even in one of Africa's historically strongest press-freedom environments, accountability journalism remains vulnerable when it touches extractive wealth, elite privilege, or state-connected economic interests. Tafirenyika's reporting therefore offers a useful lens for understanding journalism not merely as media output but as democratic and political-economic infrastructure.