
Contemporary AI evaluation measures model-level properties, safety, helpfulness, bias, at discrete points in time. These approaches share a structural blind spot: they cannot detect the longitudinal erosion of the most valuable asset humanity has ever produced.Human diversity is not a demographic statistic. It is the accumulated creative capital of thousands of years of conflict, friction, migration, and exchange. It is the fuel of civilisational creativity, and it was built at enormous cost. Minority populations and communities of the Global South carry disproportionate shares of this diversity, precisely because they have been least absorbed into dominant knowledge systems. AI systems, trained predominantly on majority-population data and optimised for aggregate engagement, are eroding this catalog at pace. We cannot value what we cannot measure. We cannot protect what we cannot value.This paper proposes a remedy. The Humane Intelligence Quotient (HIQ) is a longitudinal audit framework designed to serve as the measurement engine for an AI alignment and ethics leaderboard: a public, replicable, empirically grounded mechanism for evaluating AI systems not on capability alone, but on their capacity to preserve and enrich human diversity over time. The framework is organised around three measurable dimensions: diversity of behavioural repertoires, connectivity of value circulation across populations, and temporal agility in adaptation.The case rests on empirical ground. Analysing 529,428 real-world human–AI conversations across eight months, conventional engagement indicators suggested improvement. HIQ structural indicators told a different story: a statistically significant decline in behavioural diversity (slope = −0.012, p = 0.020) and misleading connectivity gains driven by the differential collapse of minority-population input diversity. When you measure what actually matters, you find things that standard metrics are structurally incapable of seeing. The full analysis pipeline and code are publicly available for independent replication.
AI evaluation, sociotechnical systems, pluralism, longitudinal audit, Humane Intelligence Quotient, HIQ, behavioural diversity, Global South, AI governance, resilience, human-centered AI
AI evaluation, sociotechnical systems, pluralism, longitudinal audit, Humane Intelligence Quotient, HIQ, behavioural diversity, Global South, AI governance, resilience, human-centered AI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
