This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Morten Magnusson’s Energy-Flow Cosmology (EFC v2.1): Modular Synthesis across Structure, Dynamics, and Cognition in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO), developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines the conceptual architecture of Energy-Flow Cosmology, especially its thermodynamic articulation of cosmic structure, energy flow, entropy, emergent time, the Grid–Higgs field, and the cognitive extension of cosmological dynamics. The analysis investigates possible compatibilities and points of tension between Magnusson’s proposal and the modal axioms of the Theory of Objectivity, considering the TO’s foundational bibliography, recent developments, phenomenic elements, Inducer Effects, cosmogonic theorem, and cosmological Eras. Special attention is given to the relation between energy, information, cognition, and the TO concept of the transcendent element, understood as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article argues that EFC v2.1 constitutes a highly relevant interlocutor for the Theory of Objectivity due to its attempt to unify structure, dynamics, and cognition within a thermodynamic cosmological framework. However, it also identifies important theoretical tensions, especially regarding modal grounding, empirical testability, the interpretation of dark matter, cosmic microwave background radiation, and the hypothesis of a cosmologically variable speed of light. This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords:Theory of Objectivity; Vidamor Cabannas; Energy-Flow Cosmology; Morten Magnusson; thermodynamic cosmology; entropy; energy flow; Grid–Higgs field; emergent time; cognition; consciousness; information; atomic radiation; transcendent element; Inducer Effects; modal ontology; cosmogony; alternative cosmology; dark matter; cosmic microwave background; philosophy of physics.