
Agile Scrum gave software development a teachable operating model — but the model presumes biological team members with continuous memory, ambient context propagation through co-presence, and conversation as the carrier of decisions. When the Dev Team is non-human, all three assumptions fail at once. Modern agentic platforms supply capability — language models, agent harnesses, tool integrations — but they do not specify how a team-sized unit operates around them. This paper specifies that operating model. It is the day-to-day form of the Skipjack Protocol applied to a team-sized unit of work, occupying the Application layer of the four-tier governance flow the Mission-Ready AI decalogy describes (Framework HGC³AE² → Protocol Skipjack → Harness → Application). The model is teachable: it has named ceremonies, named artifacts, named gate criteria, and a defined cadence. Four claims structure the paper. Ceremony cadence is structural, not optional — the standup analogue, the sprint-planning analogue, and the retrospective analogue exist because operator comprehension decays between sessions and must be re-established by routine. The orchestrator is the admission-gate arbiter — no task enters the Agentic Execution Layer without verification that it carries a Governance-Layer-approved decomposition envelope. Stories and tasks layer over HG+C³ and AE² as first-class governance artifacts — a story is a curation envelope plus a context contract, and a task is an admission-gated, evidence-producing decomposition. Context-boundary maintenance is implemented as a multi- account split — cognitive modes are isolated into distinct agent contexts, with re-unification at named decision points and drift detection as a continuous routine. Paper Six is the sixth paper in the Mission-Ready AI decalogy and the first of three Application-layer depth papers. The operating model the paper describes is the model under which the decalogy itself was written; the working portfolio is its existence proof. Rights envelope: Citation permitted with full attribution. No reproduction, redistribution, or derivative works without written permission. AI/ML training use disallowed. See the citation policy at https://nonsequitur.tech/pubs/citation-policy/ for the full rights envelope. Canonical site URL: https://nonsequitur.tech/white-papers/operating-model-agentic-teams/ Public archive: yks-pubs/papers/operating-model-agentic-teams-v1-preprint.pdf
context-boundary, multi-account, agentic-teams, drift-detection, mission-ready-ai, skipjack-protocol, agile-scrum, admission-gate, operating-model
context-boundary, multi-account, agentic-teams, drift-detection, mission-ready-ai, skipjack-protocol, agile-scrum, admission-gate, operating-model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
