Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Operating Model for Agentic Teams: Standup, Sprint Planning, and Context Discipline When the Dev Team Is Non-Human

Authors: Kuiper, Justin H.;

Operating Model for Agentic Teams: Standup, Sprint Planning, and Context Discipline When the Dev Team Is Non-Human

Abstract

Agile Scrum gave software development a teachable operating model — but the model presumes biological team members with continuous memory, ambient context propagation through co-presence, and conversation as the carrier of decisions. When the Dev Team is non-human, all three assumptions fail at once. Modern agentic platforms supply capability — language models, agent harnesses, tool integrations — but they do not specify how a team-sized unit operates around them. This paper specifies that operating model. It is the day-to-day form of the Skipjack Protocol applied to a team-sized unit of work, occupying the Application layer of the four-tier governance flow the Mission-Ready AI decalogy describes (Framework HGC³AE² → Protocol Skipjack → Harness → Application). The model is teachable: it has named ceremonies, named artifacts, named gate criteria, and a defined cadence. Four claims structure the paper. Ceremony cadence is structural, not optional — the standup analogue, the sprint-planning analogue, and the retrospective analogue exist because operator comprehension decays between sessions and must be re-established by routine. The orchestrator is the admission-gate arbiter — no task enters the Agentic Execution Layer without verification that it carries a Governance-Layer-approved decomposition envelope. Stories and tasks layer over HG+C³ and AE² as first-class governance artifacts — a story is a curation envelope plus a context contract, and a task is an admission-gated, evidence-producing decomposition. Context-boundary maintenance is implemented as a multi- account split — cognitive modes are isolated into distinct agent contexts, with re-unification at named decision points and drift detection as a continuous routine. Paper Six is the sixth paper in the Mission-Ready AI decalogy and the first of three Application-layer depth papers. The operating model the paper describes is the model under which the decalogy itself was written; the working portfolio is its existence proof. Rights envelope: Citation permitted with full attribution. No reproduction, redistribution, or derivative works without written permission. AI/ML training use disallowed. See the citation policy at https://nonsequitur.tech/pubs/citation-policy/ for the full rights envelope. Canonical site URL: https://nonsequitur.tech/white-papers/operating-model-agentic-teams/ Public archive: yks-pubs/papers/operating-model-agentic-teams-v1-preprint.pdf

Keywords

context-boundary, multi-account, agentic-teams, drift-detection, mission-ready-ai, skipjack-protocol, agile-scrum, admission-gate, operating-model

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green