Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Agile Scrum, Agentics, and the Skipjack Protocol: Governed Collaboration Between Human Judgment and Agentic Execution

Authors: Kuiper, Justin H.;

Agile Scrum, Agentics, and the Skipjack Protocol: Governed Collaboration Between Human Judgment and Agentic Execution

Abstract

Agile Scrum has governed software development execution for more than two decades. Its core commitments — iterative delivery, transparency, team collaboration, and responsiveness to change — remain valid in the age of AI. What Scrum was not designed for is a world in which artificial intelligence agents actively participate in execution: not as tools that human team members use, but as actors that decompose, execute, iterate, and report within the same workflow as their human counterparts. This paper bridges that gap. It extends traditional Agile Scrum into an agentic operating model — a framework in which human teams and AI systems function as a unified execution layer, governed by a shared protocol. That protocol is the Skipjack Protocol. The extension works by remap, not replacement. The Product Owner maps to a Governance Layer of humans with domain authority who define intent, constraints, and prioritization. The Scrum Master maps to an Orchestrator responsible for task routing, flow control, and system health. The Development Team maps to an Agentic Execution Layer of AI agents and human operators who execute within governed boundaries. The Backlog maps to persistent memory and task queues, maintaining epistemic continuity across sprint cycles. The Skipjack Protocol governs this system through four enforcement mechanisms: context integrity and epistemic continuity; structured task decomposition and routing; human-in-the-loop control points; and iterative feedback loops that close between human judgment and agentic execution. Together, they ensure that the three-tier architecture operates with integrity at any scale. Paper Five is the fifth paper in the Mission-Ready AI pentalogy. The key to scaling AI is not autonomy alone — it is governed collaboration between human judgment and agentic execution. Rights envelope: Citation permitted with full attribution. No reproduction, redistribution, or derivative works without written permission. AI/ML training use disallowed. See the citation policy at https://nonsequitur.tech/pubs/citation-policy/ for the full rights envelope. Canonical site URL: https://nonsequitur.tech/white-papers/skipjack-protocol/ Public archive: yks-pubs/papers/skipjack-protocol-v1-preprint.pdf

Keywords

hitl, context-integrity, mission-ready-ai, role-remap, skipjack-protocol, agentic-ai, agile-scrum, human-in-the-loop, ai-governance

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green