Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Measuring Relational Risk in VLOPs: Field evidence and audit implications for DSA Systemic Risk Assessment

Field evidence from a 45-day Instagram study — implications for DSA systemic risk assessment and ECAT audit methodology
Authors: Nogués, Nicko;

Measuring Relational Risk in VLOPs: Field evidence and audit implications for DSA Systemic Risk Assessment

Abstract

This science-for-policy brief presents findings from a 45-day observational Instagram field study conducted between 10 March and 21 April 2026 as part of the CARA Initiative. The study examines whether VLOP recommender systems can expose newly created, passive accounts to high-intensity content within an identity-sensitive masculinity ecosystem, without search, follows, posting, likes, comments or active engagement. The brief introduces CARA — Cohesion & Amplification Risk Assessment — as an operational measurement layer for observing relational risk, exposure trajectories, content intensity and algorithmic positioning in recommender systems. It summarises key field findings, including early Level 4 exposure in two new accounts, sustained Level 3 exposure in a neutral-entry account, and a calibrated CIS result in which Gate F was not activated. The document is intended for policy, regulatory and institutional audiences, particularly in relation to DSA systemic risk assessment, external audit methodology, ECAT/JRC-oriented discussion, and data-access needs under DSA Article 40. It is a policy-facing summary and differs from the full working paper in scope, format, length and intended audience.

Keywords

systemic risk assessment, external audit, social cohesion, masculinity ecosystems, CARA, CSAA, ECAT, Global South, Cohesion and Amplification Risk Assessment, DSA Article 34, AI governance, DSA Article 40, platform governance, relational risk, algorithmic amplification, JRC, Instagram, Digital Services Act, recommender systems, VLOPs, identity-sensitive ecosystems, algorithmic transparency, online harms

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green