
This science-for-policy brief presents findings from a 45-day observational Instagram field study conducted between 10 March and 21 April 2026 as part of the CARA Initiative. The study examines whether VLOP recommender systems can expose newly created, passive accounts to high-intensity content within an identity-sensitive masculinity ecosystem, without search, follows, posting, likes, comments or active engagement. The brief introduces CARA — Cohesion & Amplification Risk Assessment — as an operational measurement layer for observing relational risk, exposure trajectories, content intensity and algorithmic positioning in recommender systems. It summarises key field findings, including early Level 4 exposure in two new accounts, sustained Level 3 exposure in a neutral-entry account, and a calibrated CIS result in which Gate F was not activated. The document is intended for policy, regulatory and institutional audiences, particularly in relation to DSA systemic risk assessment, external audit methodology, ECAT/JRC-oriented discussion, and data-access needs under DSA Article 40. It is a policy-facing summary and differs from the full working paper in scope, format, length and intended audience.
systemic risk assessment, external audit, social cohesion, masculinity ecosystems, CARA, CSAA, ECAT, Global South, Cohesion and Amplification Risk Assessment, DSA Article 34, AI governance, DSA Article 40, platform governance, relational risk, algorithmic amplification, JRC, Instagram, Digital Services Act, recommender systems, VLOPs, identity-sensitive ecosystems, algorithmic transparency, online harms
systemic risk assessment, external audit, social cohesion, masculinity ecosystems, CARA, CSAA, ECAT, Global South, Cohesion and Amplification Risk Assessment, DSA Article 34, AI governance, DSA Article 40, platform governance, relational risk, algorithmic amplification, JRC, Instagram, Digital Services Act, recommender systems, VLOPs, identity-sensitive ecosystems, algorithmic transparency, online harms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
