This technical report clarifies the architectural conditions under which coherence representation acquires affect-like organization within cognitive regulation. Building on earlier work in the series, the paper starts from three established results: coherence representation functions as a compressed regulatorily available signal under restricted accessibility, manifestation exceeds current enacted processing, and coherence-related manifestation may already be directionally organized in terms of worsening, maintained stability, and movement toward reduced pressure. On this basis, the report argues that no additional affect-variable or separate affect-domain is required. Instead, the already established coherence representation may acquire a more specific role when it functions as a compressed, rapidly accessible, integrative, and regulatorily weighted significance of state and directionality relative to ongoing stability conditions. To make this role minimally explicit, the report introduces a compact formal insert in which the current state is treated as a modifiable structural configuration, projected configurations are evaluated relative to the invariant-induced stability region, and directional significance is expressed through change in coherence distance. Using this framework, the paper develops burden-like, relief-like, threat-like, and attraction-like organization as differentiated role-forms of the same coherence representation. It further argues that affect-like organization is not confined to enacted processing, but may arise across inner manifestation, including projected and presently non-admitted configurations. The report remains deliberately bounded. It does not formalize explicit feeling, qualia, outward expression, or inter-system readability. Its contribution is a strict architectural clarification of how coherence representation acquires affect-like organization across inner manifestation, thereby strengthening the bridge between coherence representation, directional significance, and metaregulation without multiplying the ontology of the theory.