
This article critically reconsiders the conventional distinction between developed and developing countries. It argues that this binary classification is no longer analytically adequate, as it obscures historical responsibility, ignores colonial legacies, and presents hierarchical global relations as natural and neutral. The article draws on a postcolonial approach, which makes it possible to view development not as a universal and linear model, but as a historically and politically conditioned discourse. It emphasizes the need to construct new conceptual frameworks based on historical justice, epistemic plurality, and economic sovereignty. The article concludes that only a reconsideration of the underlying assumptions of development can open the way to imagining a more just global order that does not reproduce the logic of colonial domination under the guise of development.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
