Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

"Technology and Diversity in Entrepreneurship - A Comparative Study of Chikodi and Belagavi District, Karnataka"

Authors: Mrs. Pooja S Hegde; Dr. Vinayak. M. Bhandari;

"Technology and Diversity in Entrepreneurship - A Comparative Study of Chikodi and Belagavi District, Karnataka"

Abstract

This research paper examines the role of technology and diversity in entrepreneurship through a comparative analysis of Chikodi and Belagavi, Karnataka. A thorough investigation studies both gender and technological influences in business operations while examining technological impacts across various social and economic groups serving the regions. Primary data collection depended on questionnaires distributed to Entrepreneurs in Chikodi and Belagavi Districts provided their information through a purpose built questionnaire about their technological adoption practices. The study focuses on key demographic variables such as gender, age, education, and type of business, assessing how these factors influence the adoption and usage of technology in entrepreneurial activities and challenges they face in integrating technology into their business. A major findings of the study is male and female entrepreneurs show different technological approach patterns in their business activities yet female entrepreneurs face obstacles in acquiring appropriate technology tools. Noticeable differences between Chikodi and Belagavi in terms of technological infrastructure, awareness, and entrepreneurial support systems. The study concludes that there is a necessity to increase support for women entrepreneurs by means of training programs and improved access to technology in rural areas, to foster inclusive entrepreneurial development.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Technology, Diversity, Chikodi, Belagavi, Entrepreneurship

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average