Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Open access has grown enormously in he last 5 years and already 30% of all english language STM papers is published in open access. Making open access the default publishing method however is hampered by a set of common misbeliefs especially the idea that open access is low quality science, is too expensive, it is too difficult to convert existing journals to open access, there are no good business models and others.This paper explains the realities of open access that defy many of the reasons why many scientists and universities are still reluctant to fully support open access, especially in the global south. We will show that many of these prevailing ideas on open access are false and are not based on facts. We will also show how better information, a change in mindset and new policies by governments and funding bodies can make open access a reality also for scientists from the global south in the next 5 years
Keynote speech at Universite de la Manouba, BNP*, ISD** COLLOQUE INTERNATIONAL SUR LE LIBRE ACCES CILA 2016 Tunis, Tunisie, 1-3 Dec 2016 * unite de recherche Bibliotheque Numerique et Patrimoine ** Institut Superieure de Documentation
open access, barriers, impact, global south, transition, impact, impact factor, bibliometrics, quality jpurnals, global south, open access , barriers, impact, impact factor, global south, transition, journal quality, metrics, subscription journals, questionable journalsopen, open access , barriers, impact, impact factor, global south, transition, journal quality, metrics, subscription journals, questionable journalsopen
open access, barriers, impact, global south, transition, impact, impact factor, bibliometrics, quality jpurnals, global south, open access , barriers, impact, impact factor, global south, transition, journal quality, metrics, subscription journals, questionable journalsopen, open access , barriers, impact, impact factor, global south, transition, journal quality, metrics, subscription journals, questionable journalsopen
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 3 | |
| downloads | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts