Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Baseline EEG Temporal Dynamics as a Thalamic Filter State Biomarker: A Thalamic Filter Model Account of Ketamine Antidepressant Response Prediction and Depression as Thalamic Over-Filtering

Authors: Malone, Ryan;

Baseline EEG Temporal Dynamics as a Thalamic Filter State Biomarker: A Thalamic Filter Model Account of Ketamine Antidepressant Response Prediction and Depression as Thalamic Over-Filtering

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects approximately 30% of major depressive disorder(MDD) cases and represents a major unmet clinical need. Ketamine produces rapid antidepressanteffects in TRD, but response is variable and no validated biomarker predicts who will respond.Multiple independent studies have now shown that baseline EEG features -- particularly vigilancestage distribution and spectral dynamics -- predict ketamine response, but no unifying mechanisticaccount of why baseline brain state should predict response to an NMDA antagonist has beenproposed. We present the Thalamic Filter Model (TFM) as a candidate mechanistic account. TheTFM proposes that depression may represent a state of thalamic over-filtering: chronicallyelevated thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN) inhibitory tone raises the thalamic impedance gate(Phi_th), narrowing conscious bandwidth and producing the cognitive rigidity, rumination, andaffective narrowing characteristic of depression. In this framework, ketamine's rapidantidepressant effect may reflect indirect TRN disinhibition via glutamatergic synapticpotentiation, transiently lowering Phi_th and expanding conscious bandwidth. Baseline EEGtemporal dynamics -- specifically lag-1 autocorrelation (AR1) and vigilance stage distribution --index individual thalamic filter state: patients with higher baseline filter impedance (lowervigilance, higher AR1) may have more room for ketamine-induced filter opening and thus greaterantidepressant response. We review published evidence from six independent ketamine EEGbiomarker studies (total n > 200) showing that lower baseline vigilance, lower baseline gammapower, and higher alpha power all predict better ketamine response -- all consistent with the TFMprediction that higher baseline filter impedance predicts greater response to filter-openingintervention. We derive three falsifiable predictions distinguishing TFM from alternative accountsand propose AR1 as a practical, low-cost baseline biomarker for ketamine response prediction.Keywords: ketamine; treatment-resistant depression; EEG biomarker; thalamic filter; thalamicreticular nucleus; AR1; autocorrelation; vigilance; antidepressant response prediction; thalamicimpedance

Keywords

thalamic reticular nucleus, thalamic impediance, ketamine, AR1, vigiliance, treatment-resistant depression, autocorrelation, antidepressant response prediction, EEG biomarker, thalamic filter

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average