
Two decades of empathy-centered leadership development have delivered real gains in trust, engagement, and psychological safety. They have also produced a structural blind spot: organizations that have become more empathetic and less perceptive at the same time. Drawing on failures at Challenger and Boeing and the contrasting sensing architecture at Paul O'Neill's Alcoa, this essay argues that modern empathy, flattened into technique, operates too late in the decision sequence to prevent the failures it is meant to address. Recovering what was lost in the translation of Einfühlung into English — the perceptual and developmental weight the word originally carried — points toward a different capability: sensing what is emerging before it has been made legible, and acting on the obligation that sensing creates. The leaders who matter most will feel accurately, and then do what the feeling requires. Keywords. empathy · Einfühlung · leadership · organizational sensing · weak signals · early warning signals · psychological safety · sensemaking · appeasement · high-reliability organizations · executive decision-making · organizational failure
leadership, executive decision-making, weak signals, perceptual capacity, psychological safety, Einfühlung, appeasement, sensemaking, high-reliability organizations, organizational sensing, organizational failure, empathy
leadership, executive decision-making, weak signals, perceptual capacity, psychological safety, Einfühlung, appeasement, sensemaking, high-reliability organizations, organizational sensing, organizational failure, empathy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
