Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Conference object . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Understanding the Role of Visual Explanations in Human-AI Collaborations in Deepfake Image Detection

Authors: Zhang, Min; Kouadri, Soraya; Wong, Patrick; McJury, Mark; Nitu Bharati; Bandara, Arosha;

Understanding the Role of Visual Explanations in Human-AI Collaborations in Deepfake Image Detection

Abstract

Deepfake images pose a growing societal challenge and global concerns. While artificial intelligence (AI) based technologies can support deepfake detection, the opaque decision-making of AI often limits effective human-AI collaboration. This study explores how visual explanations influence human decision-making, trust, and reliance in AI-based deepfake image detection. We conducted a mixed-subject study online with a representative sample of 381 UK residents. Findings show that visual explanations significantly increased human accuracy and trust but failed to improve appropriate reliance on AI. With more information from explanations, participants frequently over-relied on incorrect AI advice and under-relied on correct AI advice. This paper provides empirical evidence of non-experts' decision-making in detecting deepfake facial images with the presence of AI assistance and explanations. Our work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of human-AI collaboration in deepfake image detection.

Proceedings of the CHI 2026 Workshop on Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI); April 13–17, 2026; Barcelona, Spain.

Keywords

Deepfake detection, Human-AI collaboration, decision support, Visual explanation, explainable AI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average