
Deepfake images pose a growing societal challenge and global concerns. While artificial intelligence (AI) based technologies can support deepfake detection, the opaque decision-making of AI often limits effective human-AI collaboration. This study explores how visual explanations influence human decision-making, trust, and reliance in AI-based deepfake image detection. We conducted a mixed-subject study online with a representative sample of 381 UK residents. Findings show that visual explanations significantly increased human accuracy and trust but failed to improve appropriate reliance on AI. With more information from explanations, participants frequently over-relied on incorrect AI advice and under-relied on correct AI advice. This paper provides empirical evidence of non-experts' decision-making in detecting deepfake facial images with the presence of AI assistance and explanations. Our work contributes to a more nuanced understanding of human-AI collaboration in deepfake image detection.
Proceedings of the CHI 2026 Workshop on Human-Centered Explainable AI (HCXAI); April 13–17, 2026; Barcelona, Spain.
Deepfake detection, Human-AI collaboration, decision support, Visual explanation, explainable AI
Deepfake detection, Human-AI collaboration, decision support, Visual explanation, explainable AI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
