Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Doctoral thesis . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Thesis . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Thesis . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Target Determinability under Partial Causal Observation: A Faithful Reduction Framework

Authors: yuqiang;

Target Determinability under Partial Causal Observation: A Faithful Reduction Framework

Abstract

Many distributed, scientific, autonomous, and auditing systems face a structural problem: global facts are generated by causal event histories, while observers usually access only partial projections of those histories. Logs, explanations, measurements, or traces therefore do not by themselves guarantee that a target fact is determinable. This paper names this structural limitation the causal observability gap and develops a formal framework for studying target determinability under partial causal observation. An external target-determination problem is written as P = (ℋ, O, Q), where ℋ is the set of possible real histories, O is the real observation, and Q is the target fact. A faithful reduction maps such a problem to a formal triple (ℱ, Ω, D), where ℱ is a family of finite causal configurations, Ω is an observation function, and D is a formal target. Faithfulness requires preservation of histories, observations, and targets. The adequacy theorem proves that, under these conditions, Q is zero-error determinable from O if and only if D is zero-error determinable from Ω. The core mathematical criterion is quotient factorization: D is determinable from Ω exactly when D is constant on every observational equivalence class, equivalently when there exists g such that D = g ∘ Ω, or equivalently when the observation partition refines the target partition, Π_Ω ≼ Π_D. If two configurations have the same observation but different target values, no decision procedure depending only on the observation can solve the target problem with zero error; the pair itself is a publicly checkable certificate of non-determinability. The paper further develops reconstruction complexity, refinement monotonicity, finite ambiguity bounds, constrained causal evidence as conflict-edge coverage, dynamic configuration streams, approximate determinability, adversarial observation, observation composition, and privacy-observability tradeoffs. The contribution is a falsifiable and reproducible mathematical framework for target-fact determinability under partial causal observation, together with an engineering checker interface.

Keywords

causal observability gap faithful reduction quotient factorization observation partition constrained evidence coverage target determinability finite model verification audit determinability causal event configurations AI agent auditing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green