Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Neural Net And Deep Learning Based Brain Lump Categorization & Intensity Gradient Platform

Authors: Prashant Yadav; Mohd Danish; Md Zishan Ansari;

Neural Net And Deep Learning Based Brain Lump Categorization & Intensity Gradient Platform

Abstract

Early and reliable detection of Brain lumps including mening and gliome, remains a significant concern in clinical practice. Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) analysis relies heavily on expert interpretation, which may introduce variability and delay diagnosis. This study describes an integrated deep learning-based system for automated brain tumor detection. The developed system, termed the Automated Neuro-Diagnostic Assistant (ANDA), is designed using a customized Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) trained on preprocessed MRI datasets.\\nA key feature of the system is its deployment as an interactive real-time web application using Flask, incorporating modules such as a confidence score visualizer and an automated report generator. Experimental results indicate a classification accuracy of 96% along with an F1-score of 94%, demonstrating reliable prediction capability. The proposed evaluation metric (Fscore) provides a unified assessment of system performance by combining accuracy, interpretability, and usability factors. Fscore = ⌊0.35A + 0.25C + 0.15V + 0.10(HI + SI + UI)⌉ Where A represents classification accuracy, C denotes confidence reliability, V indicates the effectiveness of visual interpretation, HI refers to healthcare insight generation, SI represents stroke identification capability, and UI denotes overall system usability. Further evaluation on diverse MRI samples shows strong agreement (r = 0.89) with expected diagnostic patterns and consistent performance across tumor categories. The system improves interpretability and user interaction efficiency, enabling faster and more structured medical image analysis. Overall, the system provides stable processing, real-time prediction capability, and efficient handling of medical data. By integrating automated detection with supportive visual outputs, it enhances accessibility to AI-assisted diagnostic tools and supports preliminary medical assessment.\\n

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green