Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The Closure Operator: A Scale‑Invariant Mechanism for Coherence in Physical and Developmental Systems

Authors: Bailey, Denis;

The Closure Operator: A Scale‑Invariant Mechanism for Coherence in Physical and Developmental Systems

Abstract

This paper introduces the closure operator, a scale‑invariant mechanism by which systems resolve unstable configurations into coherent ones. Across physical, biological, cognitive, and developmental domains, systems accumulate unresolved differences—contradictions, asymmetries, or tensions that cannot be sustained indefinitely. When compensatory processes can no longer maintain the instability, the system undergoes a closure event: the unstable configuration collapses and a coherent structure emerges.The paper traces this operator from cosmic evolution and self‑organizing physical systems to biological regulation, cognitive reorganization, relational dynamics, and human development. Although the substrates differ, the underlying mechanism is invariant: instability accumulates, compensation fails, and the system transitions into a stable orientation. This transition—expressed developmentally as the hinge—is not psychological or metaphysical but structural.By articulating closure as a general operator, the paper provides a unified framework for understanding how coherence arises across scales. It offers a structural account of transformation that complements domain‑specific theories while avoiding reductionism, metaphysics, and teleology. The result is a cross‑scale architecture that explains how systems reorganize when misalignment becomes unsustainable.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback