Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY SA
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

CFTE AI Proficiency Framework

Authors: Nguyen Trieu, Huy; Nguyen, Tram Anh; Zakir, Bareera;

CFTE AI Proficiency Framework

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming embedded across the full spectrum of knowledge work. It now shapes how professionals research, draft, analyse, decide, coordinate, and govern. Yet while adoption has accelerated rapidly, the language used to describe capability remains fragmented. Employers ask whether people are AI-ready, individuals try to signal that they are, and sectors are beginning to define their own expectations. What is still missing is a common framework that explains what AI proficiency actually means.The CFTE AI Proficiency Framework addresses that gap. It provides a shared reference model for defining, assessing, and developing AI proficiency across the professional workforce. It bridges the market-facing language of readiness with a more rigorous concept of proficiency. The framework is built around three public proficiency levels, ten capability domains, and three assessment dimensions: knowledge, skills, and behaviours. Its public structure is supported by a more granular six-band developmental model used in diagnostics and interpretation. This allows the framework to remain simple enough to communicate and rich enough to measure.The framework distinguishes durable proficiency from time-sensitive tool fluency and from the role-dependent challenge of applied capability. It is designed to be platform-agnostic, portable across institutions and sectors, and open to adaptation with attribution to CFTE. As a parent framework, it provides the common core on which methodology, diagnostics, repository examples, and official sector profiles can be built over time. It should be understood as a foundational model rather than a final doctrine: stable enough to cite and build on, yet open enough to evolve as AI tools, professional expectations, and sector needs continue to change.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence/standards, Artificial Intelligence/trends, Workforce/standards

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average