Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Weak-Signal Interpretation for Robotics Anomaly Sensing

A Stratified, Governance-Aware Architecture for Embodied Anomaly Handling
Authors: Putman, Stephen A.;

Weak-Signal Interpretation for Robotics Anomaly Sensing

Abstract

Robotic systems often encounter weak, noisy, partial, and locally ambiguous signals before a clearer anomaly becomes legible. A drive system may show slight current asymmetry, a manipulator may exhibit repeated micro-slip under otherwise plausible contact, or an environmental obstruction may appear inconsistently across perceptual routes. In such cases, the architectural problem is not only detection, but promotion control: how weak findings should influence attention before they are allowed to become stronger operational consequence. This paper argues that robotics anomaly sensing is a suitable application domain for a stratified weak-signal architecture that separates bounded observation, provisional interpretation, short-horizon attentional escalation, and governed promotion. The contribution is narrow and operational. The paper defines a minimal transfer contract for embodied anomaly handling: a light state ladder, a bounded event object, and illustrative promotion logic showing how weak signals may influence inspection before they justify stronger commitment. It does not propose a full robotics stack, semantic SLAM system, safety-certified controller, or universal diagnosis engine. Its narrower claim is that embodied systems need a disciplined place for weak anomaly signals to matter before they harden into motion change, maintenance significance, or ignored noise.

Architectural bridge paper in the broader Spanda / weak-signal interpretation series. This note argues that robotics anomaly sensing is a suitable application domain for a stratified weak-signal architecture in which bounded findings raise attention first, candidate meanings remain provisional, and stronger consequence occurs only through persistence, convergence, and governance. Note: Related source papers and architectural context for this bridge note are available in the Spanda architectural framework repository: https://github.com/putmanmodel/spanda-architectural-framework

Keywords

robotics, sensor fusion, early warning, weak signals, multi-sensor systems, embodied AI, Robotics, interpretable AI, anomaly detection, governance, autonomous systems, robotics safety, anomaly sensing

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green