
Sexual harassment at the workplace in India is not a gap in law—it is a gap in enforcement. From Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan to the 2013 Workplace Act and post-Nirbhaya criminal law reforms, the legal framework clearly recognises harassment as a violation of equality, dignity, and the right to work. Yet, the problem persists across institutions. This article argues that the issue is structural: rooted in hierarchy, power imbalance, and institutional reluctance to act against those in authority. It examines how mechanisms like Internal Committees often function in form rather than substance, how survivors face retaliation and silence, and how organisations prioritise reputation over justice. While the law is strong on paper, its impact remains limited without genuine accountability. The paper ultimately calls for a shift from formal compliance to real institutional courage, where workplace dignity is treated not as policy, but as a constitutional obligation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
