Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report
Data sources: ZENODO
addClaim

The Halocline: The Invisible Boundary Between Two Kinds of AI Work

Authors: Russo, Phil;

The Halocline: The Invisible Boundary Between Two Kinds of AI Work

Abstract

A practitioner guide to the boundary between two fundamentally different kinds of AI work: the Creative AI Domain and the Operational AI Domain. This guidebook explains why treating all AI work as one category leads to misapplied methods, wrong risk assumptions, and avoidable failure. It introduces the Halocline concept, defines both domains, presents The Halocline Test for classifying work, and explains how failure modes, human roles, and required discipline change when work crosses the boundary. It is positioned alongside Human-Assisted AI, The Confluent Method, and The Discipline of Dependable Software as part of the same broader body of work.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback