Stèle de Tel Dan - Comment l'étude de Demesky en 1995 a déplacé la datation de 800 ans en arrière.
Stèle de Tel Dan - Comment l'étude de Demesky en 1995 a déplacé la datation de 800 ans en arrière.
L’article de Demsky (1995) est généralement cité comme une confirmation épigraphique dela datation de la stèle de Tel Dan au IXe siècle av. n. è. Ce rapport montre que sadémonstration repose sur un présupposé implicite — la chronologie du Seder Olam Rabbah— jamais discuté. La paléographie compare la stèle à des inscriptions datées dans le mêmecadre circulaire, produisant une illusion de confirmation indépendante. Le consensus actueln’a pas été réexaminé depuis 1995.
ancient Near Eastern forgeries, Psalms of Solomon, Second Temple Judaism, Dead Sea Scrolls, Hebrew Bible, Herodian period, Tel Dan Stele, Septuagint, Aramaic epigraphy, Biblical chronology
ancient Near Eastern forgeries, Psalms of Solomon, Second Temple Judaism, Dead Sea Scrolls, Hebrew Bible, Herodian period, Tel Dan Stele, Septuagint, Aramaic epigraphy, Biblical chronology
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!