Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Deceptive Digital Identities: When Social Media Profiles Are Engineered to Deceive - How Sophisticated Actors Architect Their Online Presence and a Counter-OSINT Framework to Detect Them

Authors: Tripathy, Manish;

Deceptive Digital Identities: When Social Media Profiles Are Engineered to Deceive - How Sophisticated Actors Architect Their Online Presence and a Counter-OSINT Framework to Detect Them

Abstract

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) practitioners routinely treat social media profiles, public posts, and visible network connections as ground truth for subject profiling. This epistemological assumption fails systematically against Sophisticated Actors: individuals who deliberately architect their digital footprints as deception surfaces, producing analyst profiles that are not merely incomplete but confidently wrong. This paper presents three novel contributions. First, it formalizes Content Asymmetry as a measurable, information-theoretic deception signal, the Content Asymmetry Index (CAI) quantifying the mutual information gap between permanent and ephemeral content channels, and characterizing the analyst's achievable profile accuracy under asymmetric content partitioning. Second, it applies graph-theoretic attack surface reduction to social identity, modeling the Sophisticated Actor's deliberate pruning of their visible social graph as adversarial edge deletion and analyzing its impact on betweenness centrality, community detection, and influence propagation. Third, it presents an integrated five-phase Counter-OSINT Reconnaissance framework, combining curation detection, cross-surface temporal correlation, second-degree network reconstruction, cross-platform artifact correlation, and multimodal intelligence integration into an iterative, deception-resistant profiling methodology. These contributions are grounded in a longitudinal practitioner-researcher observation study conducted over eight years (February 2018 – February 2026), encompassing systematic analysis of over 100,000 social media profiles across multiple platforms. The study yields eighteen persona engineering techniques, twelve composite behavioral archetypes and six structural platform-exploitation strategies constituting a formal persona engineering taxonomy, a five-phase counter-OSINT methodology with operational tool chains, and a three-tier confidence stratification framework that explicitly calibrates profile element reliability against source independence and collection depth.

Related Organizations
Keywords

social network analysis, adversarial identity engineering, deception detection, open-source intelligence, OSINT, digital identity, digital footprint, Graph theory, persona engineering, information-theoretic security, counter-intelligence, social media deception, SOCMINT, behavioral attribution, content asymmetry

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green