Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Data Trust Index: A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Health Data Integrity in AI Systems

Authors: Snyder, Jason Alan;

The Data Trust Index: A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Health Data Integrity in AI Systems

Abstract

The Data Trust Index (DTI) is a multidimensional scoring framework that assigns a continuous integrity score ranging from 0 to 100 to health data records before they are used in downstream AI inference. DTI evaluates eight weighted dimensions: Provenance (25%), Consent (20%), Recency (15%), Quality (10%), Concordance (10%), Validation (10%), Breadth (5%), and Stability (5%). This paper describes the theoretical basis for each dimension, the time-decay functions applied to temporal signals, and the concordance methodology used to corroborate signals across independent sources. It presents a retrospective deployment case study with imaware, a direct-to-consumer diagnostics company, in which DTI-based segmentation reduced data preparation cycles from three weeks to two hours and surfaced a customer segment accounting for 20% of revenue that was previously invisible in fragmented data views. The paper situates DTI within the regulatory landscape of the 21st Century Cures Act, the FDA's AI/ML-Based Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) guidance, and TEFCA, arguing that a standardized trust metric for health data is a prerequisite for safely deploying clinical AI at scale. A prospective multi-site validation protocol is published as a pre-registered methodological framework for future study. The DTI framework and its underlying ALDR engine are covered by U.S. patent application SuperTruth0010CP1.

Keywords

Healthcare AI, clinical decision support, HIPAA, federated learning, TEFCA, AI data quality, data provenance, longitudinal health data, FDA SaMD, health data quality, data integrity, consent management, health data governance, electronic health records, health infromatics, DTI, Data Trust Index, data trust, 21st Century Cures Act

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green