Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

TRANSFERABILITY IN QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH: ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CARE

Authors: CALAMAAN, MAVERICK;

TRANSFERABILITY IN QUALITATIVE NURSING RESEARCH: ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR EVIDENCE-BASED CARE

Abstract

Transferability constitutes a cardinal dimension of rigor in qualitative nursing research, delineating the extent to which findings may possess contextual applicability across diverse clinical milieus. Within the paradigm of evidence-based care, the capacity to extrapolate meaning from contextually bound data is indispensable for informed clinical decision-making. Despite its theoretical prominence, transferability remains inconsistently operationalized, thereby constraining the translational efficacy of qualitative evidence in nursing practice. This inquiry employed an integrative review design, synthesizing extant empirical and methodological literature pertinent to transferability in qualitative research. Purposive selection of peer-reviewed sources ensured the inclusion of contextually rich and methodologically robust studies. Data extraction and thematic analysis were undertaken to identify recurrent patterns, conceptual frameworks, and methodological strategies that enhance the applicability of qualitative findings across settings. The synthesis revealed that transferability is predominantly reinforced through the provision of thick, nuanced contextual descriptions, purposive sampling of information-rich participants, and rigorous methodological transparency. Ancillary strategies, including reflexivity, triangulation, and the maintenance of audit trails, further augment interpretive depth and contextual relevance. However, the findings also underscore a persistent deficiency in detailed contextual reporting within qualitative nursing studies, thereby attenuating their practical utility. The study elucidates that transferability is not an intrinsic attribute but a methodologically constructed outcome contingent upon deliberate research design and reporting practices. Strengthening transferability enhances the interpretive and pragmatic value of qualitative evidence, thereby facilitating its integration into evidence-based nursing care. Consequently, advancing methodological rigor through comprehensive contextualization and transparent reporting is imperative to optimize the applicability of qualitative insights in diverse healthcare environments.

Keywords

transferability, qualitative research, nursing research, trustworthiness, qualitative rigor, evidence-based practice

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average