Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Castianeirodes insulicola Haddad 2026, comb. nov.

Authors: Haddad, Charles R.;

Castianeirodes insulicola Haddad 2026, comb. nov.

Abstract

Castianeirodes insulicola (Strand, 1916) comb. nov. Figs 1, 6A Castianeira insulicola Strand, 1916: 90 (♀ holotype: D.R. CONGO: Lake Kivu, Kwidjwi Island [Idjwi Island, 02°10'S, 29°03'E], IX.1907, leg. A.F. Herzog, ZMB 27151 —examined); Roewer 1955: 610; World Spider Catalog 2025. Castianeirodes insulicola Strand, 1916: 91; Petrunkevitch 1928: 179; Bonnet 1956: 972. Diagnosis. Females can be easily distinguished by the shape of the epigynal ridges, which are comma-shaped and strongly curved vs crescent-shaped and less strongly curved in C. jocquei sp. nov., C. kakamega sp. nov. and C. natalensis sp. nov.. Additionally, the mesal section of the epigynal ridges is broadened whereas it is narrowed in the other three species (cf. Fig. 6A and 6B, 7A, 8A). Male unknown. Female (holotype, Idjwi Island, ZMB 27151). Measurements: CL 2.20, CW 1.33, AL 2.70, AW 2.12, TL 4.90, FL 0.17, SL 0.98, SW 0.85, AME 0.11, ALE 0.05, PME 0.10, PLE 0.09, AME–AME 0.08, AME–ALE 0.03, ALE–ALE 0.37, PME–PME 0.14, PME–PLE 0.10, PLE–PLE 0.43, PERW 0.56, MOQAW 0.40, MOQPW 0.33, MOQL 0.38. Length of leg segments: I 1.65 + 0.49 + 1.10 + 0.99 + 0.62 = 4.85; II 1.39 + 0.49 + 1.05 + 1.00 + 0.64 = 4.57; III 1.28 + 0.50 + 1.05 + 1.06 + 0.60 = 4.49; IV missing. General appearance as in Fig. 1A; specimen somewhat faded, colour described based on current condition. Carapace brown, with black mottling and striae radiating from fovea to palps and coxae; eyes with black rings. Clypeus height equal to 2× AME diameter at AME, 4× ALE diameter at ALE; AME separated by 0.71× their diameter; AME separated from ALE by 0.63× ALE diameter; PME separated by 1.5× their diameter; PME separated from PLE by PME diameter; CW:PERW = 2.38:1. Chelicerae yellow-brown, creamy-brown mesally and posteriorly; endites yellow-brown, white along mesal margin; labium yellow-brown, white distally; sternum yellow-brown, with faint grey mottling. Coxae I brown, II–IV creamy-yellow; femora brown, with white patches dorsally and ventrally in distal 1/3; all patellae brown laterally, white dorsally and ventrally; tibiae to tarsi I–III yellow-brown, with faint grey mottling laterally, white stripes along entire length dorsally and ventrally, IV uniform yellow-brown. Leg spination (both legs IV missing): femora: I pl 2 do 3, II pl 1 do 3, III pl 2 do 3 rl 2; patellae: spineless; tibiae: I pl 2 plv 3 rlv 3, II pl 2 plv 3 rlv 3, III pl 2 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2; metatarsi: I plv 2 rlv 2, II plv 2 rlv 2, III pl 1 rl 2 plv 2 rlv 2 vt 3. Palpal spination: femora: pl 1 do 2; patellae: pl 1 do 1; tibiae: pl 1 plv 1; tarsi: pl 1 plv 1. Abdomen with broad orange-brown dorsal scutum extending to 0.81× abdomen length, covered in black mottling; short white feathery setae covering most of dorsum; venter creamy-grey, with faint grey mottling. Epigyne with strongly curved, comma-shaped ridges just behind midpoint of epigyne, with copulatory openings situated laterally in ridges; epigynal ridges broadened mesally; in external view, ST II oval, with distinct oblique fold; ST I subtriangular (Figs 1C, 6A); internal structure not examined. Distribution. Only known from the type locality (Fig. 9).

Published as part of Haddad, Charles R., 2026, On the arboreal Afrotropical ant-mimicking castianeirine spider genus Castianeirodes Strand, 1916 (Araneae: Corinnidae), pp. 139-154 in Zootaxa 5777 (1) on page 146, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5777.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/19180776

Keywords

Corinnidae, Arthropoda, Arachnida, Castianeirodes insulicola, Animalia, Araneae, Biodiversity, Taxonomy, Castianeirodes

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green