Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint
Data sources: ZENODO
Zenodo
Claim

AI Must Not Testify: Design Principles for Legal AI Derived from the Hearsay Rule

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Preprint Under curationPublisher:Zenodo
Authors: NAKAMURA, Kenji;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19505575

AI Must Not Testify: Design Principles for Legal AI Derived from the Hearsay Rule

Abstract

Current discourse on the integration of artificial intelligence into legal practice centers on a single question: how can AI outputs be rendered usable in court? This article challenges that premise.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback