
We present the Creation Ledger, a protocol for token economics grounded in verified creative process rather than computational expenditure, staked capital, or attention signals. The protocol introduces Proof of Provenance (PoP) — a consensus primitive where tokens are minted exclusively through verified human-directed creative work, as validated by Cognitive Rhythm Analysis (CRA) of embedded decision trees. The protocol addresses three structural failures that have destroyed every prior creator token platform: (1) speculation crowding out utility at launch, (2) verification systems that are cheaper to forge than to use honestly, and (3) regulatory classification as securities due to revenue-sharing mechanics. The system is protected by nine provisional patent applications (193 claims across four patent families) filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Patent Support: Patents 1-9 filed March 30, 2026. 193 total claims across Dense Notation, Proxy Provenance, Self-Proving Documents, Decision-Chain Provenance, Schema Registry, Delivery Protocol, Code Closure, Format-Provenance Fusion, and Document-Directed Computation.
White paper for the Creation Ledger protocol. Protected by 9 provisional patents (193 claims) filed March 30, 2026.
AI authorship, proof of provenance, decision provenance, self-proving documents, document format, creation ledger, token economics, Howey test, cognitive rhythm analysis, regulatory compliance, MiCA, creator tokens, process commons, verified creative process
AI authorship, proof of provenance, decision provenance, self-proving documents, document format, creation ledger, token economics, Howey test, cognitive rhythm analysis, regulatory compliance, MiCA, creator tokens, process commons, verified creative process
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
