Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Mentor::i: code, data, and supplementary materials for "Systematic Ablation Reveals Hidden Failures in Multi-Agent AI for Science"

Systematic Ablation Reveals Hidden Failures in Multi-Agent AI for Science
Authors: Bianchi, Valerio; Schokker, Dirkjan;

Mentor::i: code, data, and supplementary materials for "Systematic Ablation Reveals Hidden Failures in Multi-Agent AI for Science"

Abstract

This deposit contains the code, data, and supplementary materials for the paper "Systematic Ablation Reveals Hidden Failures in Multi-Agent AI for Science" by Bianchi & Schokker, 2026 The paper introduces a systematic ablation methodology for retrieval-augmented multi-agent AI systems, validated through a triple-triangulation evaluation framework that combines deterministic ground-truth metrics, calibrated LLM-as-judge scoring, and natural-language-inference fact-checking. The methodology is applied to more than 36,000 individual evaluations spanning 200 scientific papers and 250 expert-curated questions across ten experiments. Contents of this deposit: - corpus_papers.csv — 200-paper manifest (50 core bioinformatics / veterinary epidemiology papers + 150 arXiv distractors) with DOIs, PMC IDs, arXiv IDs, source URLs, and licensing.- download_corpus.py — Python script that recreates the corpus on demand from the manifest.- corpus_README.md — reproduction guide for the 200-paper corpus.- corpus_metadata.json — per-paper metadata for the 50 core papers.- ground_truth.json — 250 expert-curated evaluation questions with expected answers and concepts.- validation_main.json, validation_cross_document.json, validation_synthesis.json, validation_ood.json — question validation results across the four categories.- mentori_results.tar.gz — raw JSON outputs from all ten experiments (V4-0 through V4-9), 47 MB compressed, ~200 MB extracted.- paper_figures.Rmd — single source of truth for all main and Extended Data figures, as an R Markdown document.- paper_figures_tiff.tar.gz — pre-rendered TIFF versions of every figure at 300 dpi (the submission versions for the Extended Data figures).- paper_figures_pdf.tar.gz — pre-rendered PDF (vector) versions of every figure (the submission versions for the main figures). To reproduce the paper figures from scratch: git clone https://github.com/vbianchi/Mentori.git cd Mentori ./publication/data/download_results.sh Rscript -e "rmarkdown::render('publication/reports/paper_figures.Rmd')" The Mentori multi-agent workspace itself is an open-source software release available at https://github.com/vbianchi/Mentori and is licensed separately under MIT for the code and CC-BY 4.0 for figures and derived data. The 200-paper evaluation corpus is NOT redistributed in primary form in this deposit due to publisher copyright. Use download_corpus.py (included) together with corpus_papers.csv to reconstruct the exact corpus on demand.

Related Organizations
Keywords

multi-agent AI, retrieval-augmented generation, RAG evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge, benchmark, ablation, scientific AI, construct validity, faithfulness, natural language inference, bioinformatics, veterinary epidemiology, reproducible research

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities