Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

AI Workflow Design for Official Statistics

Authors: Webb, Brock;

AI Workflow Design for Official Statistics

Abstract

A practitioner's guide to designing reliable AI/LLM-powered workflows for official statistics and research in high-accountability environments. Covers the full lifecycle from design through deployment: classification and coding workflows, data wrangling, extraction, ensemble and multi-model architectures, pipeline infrastructure, evaluation frameworks, state management and validity, security and supply chain, institutional governance, and cost analysis. Written for the interdisciplinary teams that build and operate AI systems in federal statistical agencies and similar organizations: data scientists, statisticians, research methodologists, software engineers, IT and security professionals, and the program managers who coordinate them. Each role will find chapters that speak directly to their work and chapters that help them understand what the rest of the team needs. The book introduces State Fidelity Validity (SFV), a framework for identifying how LLM-specific failure modes threaten classical research validity, and demonstrates design patterns through the Federal Survey Concept Mapper case study (6,954 survey questions, dual-model cross-validation, Cohen's kappa = 0.839). This is a living document. The design principles are durable; tool-specific guidance will be updated as the field evolves. Corrections and new content will appear in subsequent versions. The latest edition is always available at https://brockwebb.github.io/ai-workflow-design/. Companion to AI for Official Statistics (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19206379). Where that book introduces AI concepts for statisticians, this book teaches how to build AI pipelines that work reliably when the work matters.

Keywords

LLM workflows, evaluation framework, statistical agencies, ensemble methods, machine learning operations, provenance, artificial intelligence, human-in-the-loop, AI governance, data pipeline design, official statistics, prompt engineering, federal statistics, AI security, configuration management, survey methodology, data quality, state fidelity validity, natural language processing, reproducibility

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities