Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay in suspected tuberculous meningitis cases in a tertiary care setting

Authors: Dr Swapnil Vishwas Thombare , Dr. Swapna Rajesh Kanade , Dr. Chaya A Kumar , Dr. Gita Nataraj;

Evaluation of diagnostic performance of Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra assay in suspected tuberculous meningitis cases in a tertiary care setting

Abstract

Objectives: Tuberculous meningitis is the most lethal manifestation of tuberculosis. Xpert® MTB/RIF Ultra is a nucleic acid amplification test which gives result in 80 minutes and simultaneously provides information on rifampicin resistance. This study was carried out to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Xpert Ultra assay. Materials & Methods: After obtaining ethics permission, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of 50 adult cases of clinically suspected tuberculous meningitis were tested by liquid culture, Xpert® MTB/RIF assay and Xpert® Ultra assay. Statistical analysis: Of the 50 cases, MTB was detected in 16 cases. Of these, three were positive by Xpert®, 11by Ultra and 12 by culture. Of the six cases that gave trace positive result by ultra, four were negative by Xpert® and culture. One strain was rifampicin (RIF) resistant by all three methods. Results: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value (PPV) and Negative predictive value (NPV) of Xpert® Ultra was 58.33%, 89.47% ,63.63% and 87.17% in comparison with liquid culture. Conclusion: Xpert® MTB/RIF ultra-assay showed better sensitivity and high negative predictive value when compared to Xpert® MTB/RIF assay. Hence can be used in suspected cases of TBM to prevent complications like death and serious neurological disability. Trace results do not provide information on rifampicin (RIF) resistance.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green