This release is a separate doctrinal specification related to the canonical baseline publication of the Applicability Boundary Doctrine, the earlier doctrinal extension on observation validity, interpretation cutoff, and bounded reality verification, the separate doctrinal specification on epistemic applicability, and the separate doctrinal specification on reality verification. This record should be read alongside the canonical Applicability Boundary Doctrine, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19425317, the earlier related doctrinal extension, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19443895, the separate doctrinal specification on epistemic applicability, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19447536, and the separate doctrinal specification on reality verification, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19457414.It is a separate record and not a version of any prior publication. It formalizes a further doctrinal question within the same authored framework: when does a prior approval, acknowledgement, authorization, or supervisory act still fail to authorize consequence-bearing execution, and when must execution authority be renewed at commit even after approval already exists? This release should be understood as sequentially downstream from reality verification and upstream of the applicability boundary and continuation legitimacy. In doctrinal order, observation validity, epistemic applicability, reality verification, approval-execution separation, applicability boundary, and continuation legitimacy are sequential rather than interchangeable conditions. The release focuses on high-consequence and decision-bearing systems in which a valid approval may remain present in record form while the conditions required for admissible execution have already changed, expired, been superseded, or otherwise lost current force. Its purpose is doctrinal and analytical. It is intended as a citable public reference for continued work on:- approval versus execution- authorization-execution separation- execution authority- commit renewal- approval window- stale approval- revocation and supersession before commit- evidentiary fixation of approval and execution events This release deepens the authored doctrinal framework. It does not replace the canonical baseline publication, the earlier doctrinal extension, the separate doctrinal specification on epistemic applicability, or the separate doctrinal specification on reality verification. It has independent citation value as a separate doctrinal specification within the same authored framework. No implementation guidance is provided in this release. No executable architecture, runtime enforcement design, cryptographic protocol, token scheme, key management method, distributed synchronization method, operational procedure, algorithmic method, hardware prescription, deployment pattern, or integration recipe is disclosed. The publication is limited to doctrinal articulation, evidentiary framing, legitimacy analysis, and boundary clarification. Derivative interpretation, structurally similar reframing, internal reconstruction, selective reuse, or downstream implementation based on this release does not inherit authorship, originality, canonical standing, or independent evidentiary standing. No patent license or implied commercial implementation right is granted by this release. Commercial implementation, operational integration, productization, assurance packaging, certification use, or other consequence-bearing application of the framework requires separate written permission or license from the author unless independently established without reliance on this authored framework. This release should be read alongside the canonical baseline doctrine, the earlier related doctrinal extension, the separate doctrinal specification on epistemic applicability, and the separate doctrinal specification on reality verification, not as a substitute for any of them. Earlier public materials, the canonical baseline publication, the earlier doctrinal extension, the separate doctrinal specification on epistemic applicability, the separate doctrinal specification on reality verification, and independently timestamped records support continuity of authorship and development history.