Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Interior Observer Cosmological Framework: Paper 30 - One Mass, Zero Fits: Twenty Independent Tests of a Universe Inside a Black Hole

Authors: Fife, David;

The Interior Observer Cosmological Framework: Paper 30 - One Mass, Zero Fits: Twenty Independent Tests of a Universe Inside a Black Hole

Abstract

Beginning from two premises — (1) the observable universe exists inside a Schwarzschild black hole, and (2) the physics inside the horizon is the same as outside — the Interior Observer (IO) framework predicts all major cosmological observables from one measured input (M_U = 4.50 × 10⁵³ kg) and one external constant (γ_BI = 0.2375 from Loop Quantum Gravity) with zero continuously fitted parameters. This paper confronts the IO framework's Schur definitive branch (Paper 29: H₀ = 68.91 km/s/Mpc, Ω_m = 0.336, Ω_k = −0.006, Ω_Λ = 0.670) with twenty independent observational tests spanning z = 0 to z = 1100. Results: five direct comparator wins over the Planck ΛCDM fixed-parameter reference, eight non-comparator confirmations, three ties, two indistinguishable, one mild loss, and one pre-registered future prediction — all with zero fitted framework parameters. Key findings include: five independent baryon probes each see the density predicted by the BDP α-ladder; the bare-branch local-clock age (19.181 Gyr) resolves the Methuselah paradox; and the Sandage-Loeb redshift drift is a falsifiable prediction testable by the ELT ANDES spectrograph.

Keywords

baryon acoustic oscillations, interior observer, zero-parameter cosmology, Methuselah star, three-baryon structure, Multi AI research, Oppenheimer-Snyder, JWST impossible galaxies, cosmic chronometers, black hole cosmology, redshift drift

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!