Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Understanding the Regulatory Landscape in India: A Comprehensive Look at Artifical Intelligence Governance in the Healthcare Sector

Authors: Gupta, Sejal; Panwar, Arnav;

Understanding the Regulatory Landscape in India: A Comprehensive Look at Artifical Intelligence Governance in the Healthcare Sector

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming healthcare, from diagnostics andtreatment planning to patient monitoring and administrative efficiency. The globalhealthcare market is projected to grow at a 5% compound annual growth rate from 2025to 2030, reaching nearly USD 30 trillion, with inpatient and outpatient care remaining thedominant segments. Yet, the sector faces significant challenges, including fragmentedregulatory landscapes, limited talent and knowledge, uneven data access, technologymaturity gaps, and varying healthcare player adoption. In India, AI adoption in healthcare isaccelerating; however, the regulatory framework is still evolving, with multiple agenciesissuing overlapping guidelines, resulting in fragmented oversight of AI tools in healthcare.This working paper explores and compares regulatory approaches to AI in healthcareacross India, the United States, China, and the European Union. Drawing from a literaturereview of academic, regulatory, and policy sources, the study maps landscapes, identifiesgaps, and assesses implications for patient safety, innovation, and competitiveness. Byexamining these jurisdictions, the study highlights lessons from different regulatoryphilosophies and identifies strategies that could inform India’s policy evolution.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence, regulatory landscape, healthcare sector, government oversight, clinical safety, Regulation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green