Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
Open Science Framework
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Chain of Custody of the Vote: A Framework for Outcome-Detectable Elections

Authors: Santos-Simoes, Rui;

The Chain of Custody of the Vote: A Framework for Outcome-Detectable Elections

Abstract

Public confidence in election results depends on the ability to demonstrate, with evidence, that reported outcomes reflect the votes cast. This paper proposes a unified framework for the chain of custody of the vote applicable to all types of elections: manual, electronic, and hybrid. Its central contribution is the property of outcome detectability: no change to the reported electoral outcome should be possible without leaving detectable evidence somewhere in the chain of custody, making silent or undetectable outcome-changing manipulation practically impossible. Building on software independence, evidence-based elections, and risk-limiting audits, and integrating international standards on election observation and integrity, we develop a phase-based model of the electoral process, covering casting, counting, transmission, tabulation, and publication, with associated threats and required evidences at each stage. The framework is technology-agnostic and provides a common conceptual criterion against which electoral designs, procedures, and audit mechanisms can be assessed, regardless of the technology employed.

Keywords

ballot-marking devices, chain of custody, parallel vote tabulation, voting systems, Computer Sciences, Political Science, FOS: Political science, risk-limiting audits, VVPAT, ballot accounting, FOS: Law, TREP, software independence, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elections, election observation, election fraud detection, voting system, evidence-based elections, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, electoral integrity, election security, Election Law, outcome detectability, Law

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average