
Public confidence in election results depends on the ability to demonstrate, with evidence, that reported outcomes reflect the votes cast. This paper proposes a unified framework for the chain of custody of the vote applicable to all types of elections: manual, electronic, and hybrid. Its central contribution is the property of outcome detectability: no change to the reported electoral outcome should be possible without leaving detectable evidence somewhere in the chain of custody, making silent or undetectable outcome-changing manipulation practically impossible. Building on software independence, evidence-based elections, and risk-limiting audits, and integrating international standards on election observation and integrity, we develop a phase-based model of the electoral process, covering casting, counting, transmission, tabulation, and publication, with associated threats and required evidences at each stage. The framework is technology-agnostic and provides a common conceptual criterion against which electoral designs, procedures, and audit mechanisms can be assessed, regardless of the technology employed.
ballot-marking devices, chain of custody, parallel vote tabulation, voting systems, Computer Sciences, Political Science, FOS: Political science, risk-limiting audits, VVPAT, ballot accounting, FOS: Law, TREP, software independence, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elections, election observation, election fraud detection, voting system, evidence-based elections, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, electoral integrity, election security, Election Law, outcome detectability, Law
ballot-marking devices, chain of custody, parallel vote tabulation, voting systems, Computer Sciences, Political Science, FOS: Political science, risk-limiting audits, VVPAT, ballot accounting, FOS: Law, TREP, software independence, Social and Behavioral Sciences, Elections, election observation, election fraud detection, voting system, evidence-based elections, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, electoral integrity, election security, Election Law, outcome detectability, Law
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
