
The fundamental question — why is there something rather than nothing? — creates a double bind requiring both metaphysics and discipline. We derive five structural requirements that any adequate framework must satisfy and show they jointly constrain an architecture of determinate form: the necessitated genus. Part I presents the derivation. Part II presents one species — the Architecture for Rational Programmes (ARP, v0.5), a thirteen-section preamble governing any metaphysical research programme. The ARP's upward support protocol, reflexivity clause, and adversarial translation mechanism are architecturally novel. Its reflexivity provision requires programmes involving non-standard authorial agents to classify those agents within the programme's observer account or declare the gap. This paper enacts that provision: its authorship is composite, its observer classification is a declared standing anomaly, and both are within the scope of the architecture it presents.
philosophy of science methodology, demarcation problem, Lakatos, reflexivity, structured criticisability, composite authorship, metaphysical research programmes
philosophy of science methodology, demarcation problem, Lakatos, reflexivity, structured criticisability, composite authorship, metaphysical research programmes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
