
Throughout history, the word "work" referred primarily to "activity necessary for survival", such as farming and building shelter. Another definition of the word "work" is "created intellectual artifact", such as works of art or major works in philosophy. Today, most "work" in the so‑called developed world clearly fulfills neither definition, so what definition does it fulfill? According to David Graeber (2018), the answer is Bullshit Jobs, as his eponymous book explains. This short essay can be considered a "spiritual successor" to his (2013) initial article called "On the Phenomenon of Bullshit Jobs: A Work Rant". While the author himself referred to the text as a "rant", that was clearly meant modestly, as "to rant" usually means "to speak or write in an angry or emotionally charged manner", which describes neither that text nor this one. This one, however, will focus more on the moral aspect of the unnecessary nature of most modern so‑called jobs.
social philosophy, philosophy of work, labor ethics, bullshit jobs, escapism, work and meaning, misallocation of labor
social philosophy, philosophy of work, labor ethics, bullshit jobs, escapism, work and meaning, misallocation of labor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
