Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Adaptive AI Speech Therapy and Real-Time Correction Engine

Authors: Dr. J. Nafeesa Begum; Brightlin Blessy S; Harini M; Kaviya P;

Adaptive AI Speech Therapy and Real-Time Correction Engine

Abstract

Speech disorders affect over 1.5 billion people globally, yet access to timely, affordable, and expert speech therapy remains severely limited, particularly in developing nations. This paper presents the Adaptive AI Speech Therapy and Real-Time Correction Engine — a fully automated, web-accessible intelligent platform that bridges the gap between traditional clinical speech therapy and scalable, technology-mediated language rehabilitation. The system integrates four synergistic modules: (1) Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) via the Google Web Speech API achieving a Word Error Rate (WER) of 4.2% under clean conditions; (2) Word-level Pronunciation Comparison using Python's difflib SequenceMatcher, classifying each spoken word into one of four diagnostic categories — correct, missing, extra, or mispronounced; (3) Grammar Error Detection via LanguageTool NLP, attaining 92.6% precision and 85.1% recall across five grammatical error categories; and (4) a Weighted Performance Scoring algorithm combining pronunciation accuracy (70%) and grammar correctness (30%) into a clinically interpretable 0–100 composite score with five named performance bands. Implemented on a high-throughput asynchronous FastAPI backend with Pydub-driven format-agnostic audio preprocessing (supporting MP3, WAV, M4A, OGG, FLAC, WebM), the system delivers end-to-end feedback within 1.24–1.72 seconds. Experimental evaluation across 50 diverse audio samples spanning five speaker profiles, five audio quality conditions, and five sentence complexity levels demonstrates pronunciation accuracy of 95.8% on clean audio, F1-scores ranging from 0.764 to 0.954 across speaker profiles, and grammar detection performance surpassing all benchmarked commercial alternatives. The system's open-source architecture, self-hostable deployment model, and documented REST API collectively position it as a clinically viable, equitable, and extensible supplement to traditional speech therapy.

Keywords

Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR); Natural Language Processing (NLP); Speech Therapy Automation; Pronunciation Error Classification; Grammar Correction; FastAPI Microservices; LanguageTool; difflib SequenceMatcher; Real-Time Feedback; AI-Assisted Language Learning; Web-Based Rehabilitation; Word Error Rate (WER)

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average