Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other ORP type
Data sources: ZENODO
Zenodo
Claim

Is the use of 3D endoscopic transoral surgery a viable alternative to transoral robotic surgery?

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Other ORP type Under curationPublisher:Zenodo
Authors: Tripdatabase;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19367993

Is the use of 3D endoscopic transoral surgery a viable alternative to transoral robotic surgery?

Abstract

Current evidence suggests that both 3D endoscopic transoral surgery and transoral robotic surgery offer viable options with similar safety profiles, though more specific comparative research is needed across different surgical contexts.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback