Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

FUSIONDEFECTNET-A CNN VISION TRANSFORMER METHOD WITH ADAPTIVE GATING FOR EXPLAINABLE TEXTILE DEFECT DETECTION

Authors: THANDAVA KRISHNA SAI PANDRAJU, VENKANNA CHANAGONI, P MARY KAMALA KUMARI, MANEESHA VADDURI, SHAIK SALMA BEGUM, V. SUMA AVANI;

FUSIONDEFECTNET-A CNN VISION TRANSFORMER METHOD WITH ADAPTIVE GATING FOR EXPLAINABLE TEXTILE DEFECT DETECTION

Abstract

It is challenging for textile manufacturers to automate inspection due to a pronounced imbalance in the class of samples, with the majority of samples being defect-free, and the complementary nature of local and global defects. In this study, FusionDefectNet is presented as a novel hybrid architecture. For extracting local features, Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are used, and for understanding global context, Vision Transformers (ViTs) are employed. As part of the adaptive gating mechanism, the weights on branch contributions are modified based on the input attributes. The 68.7:1 class imbalance is addressed by integrating class-weighted loss with focal loss (γ=2). To gain insights into decision-making processes, use interpretable AI technologies like Grad-CAM and ViT attention visualizations. According to the TILDA dataset, we were 97.3% accurate and scored 96.9% higher than pure CNN solutions. When α is below 0.3, CNNs are preferred over other search methods for localized imperfections like holes and stains. However, for structural issues at global scale, it favors ViTs when α exceeds 0.7. According to Explainable AI, CNN identifies minor discrepancies, while ViT identifies patterns within the context that are more substantial.

Keywords

FusionDefectNet, CNN, Grad cam, Explainable AI, Focal Loss, VIT.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!