Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Effectiveness of Implementing Carbon Trading Regulation in Indonesia's Carbon Exchange (Idxcarbon): Opportunities and Challenges

Authors: Eddy Pratomo; Silverius Y. Soeharso; Agus Surono; Adnan Hamid;

Effectiveness of Implementing Carbon Trading Regulation in Indonesia's Carbon Exchange (Idxcarbon): Opportunities and Challenges

Abstract

This article evaluates the effectiveness of Indonesia's carbon trading policy implementation in the context of the newly established Indonesia Carbon Exchange (IDXCarbon). Despite the potential of carbon markets to support climate goals and economic transformation, early developments in Indonesia’s carbon exchange show signs of stagnation, limited participation, and unclear regulatory coordination. Furthermore, this article employs a multi-dimensional environmental justice framework assessing distributive, procedural, and recognition-based justice to critically examine whether the policy’s design and implementation not only facilitate market efficiency but also ensure equitable outcomes for all stakeholders, including indigenous communities, private sectors, and civil society. By situating Indonesia’s experience within global carbon market discourses and comparative international mechanism, this study offers insights that relevance to other developing economies seeking to leverage carbon trading as a tool for just and sustainable development. This paper explores the institutional, regulatory, and market-based factors contributing to the slow progress as specially on IDXCarbon. It also analyses policy opportunities and recommends strategic improvements for enhancing transparency, participation, and carbon market growth.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Carbon market governance, IDXCarbon's performance, policy implementation, climate justice, regulatory challenges.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!