
This paper identifies the boundary gap — the structural condition where no entity governs and no entity possesses the information needed to verify codebook alignment between systems — and proves via the closure property that no computation within a fixed state space resolves it. We introduce null uncertainty as a third epistemic category beyond Knight's taxonomy, where the system structurally cannot perceive the absence of a variable, and prove a computable lower bound on the number of misaligned configurations guaranteed indistinguishable from alignment by any within-system observable (Proposition 3). The bound is a pigeonhole argument over Kowalski's forced quantization theorem: for realistic organizations it exceeds 2^800. We formalize the liquid hypergraph — a data structure whose edges exist only because measurements were made — and provide a protocol (four-facet gauge, five-column canonical claims, TCP-style handshake) that implements the measurement layer. Two synthetic demonstrations show the mechanism. Code, datasets, and protocol specification: https://w3c-context-graph-community-group.github.io/protocol/ Note: still a working paper draft.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Uncertainty, Information Systems
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Uncertainty, Information Systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
