
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19211528 , 10.5281/zenodo.19212115 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211691 , 10.5281/zenodo.19340668 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211527 , 10.5281/zenodo.19359670 , 10.5281/zenodo.19343053 , 10.5281/zenodo.19301109 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211792 , 10.5281/zenodo.19359649 , 10.5281/zenodo.19356525 , 10.5281/zenodo.19343407 , 10.5281/zenodo.19321339 , 10.5281/zenodo.19338910
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19211528 , 10.5281/zenodo.19212115 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211691 , 10.5281/zenodo.19340668 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211527 , 10.5281/zenodo.19359670 , 10.5281/zenodo.19343053 , 10.5281/zenodo.19301109 , 10.5281/zenodo.19211792 , 10.5281/zenodo.19359649 , 10.5281/zenodo.19356525 , 10.5281/zenodo.19343407 , 10.5281/zenodo.19321339 , 10.5281/zenodo.19338910
A Practical Ethics Grounded in the Ordered Patch Theory If conscious experience is a rare stabilization of a private informational stream — sustained against infinite noise by a Compression Codec of physical laws, shared language, and institutional memory — then the primary moral obligation is not happiness, duty, or social contract, but the maintenance of the conditions that make experience itself possible. We call this obligation Guardianship of the Codec. Climate disruption, disinformation, and civilizational conflict are not independent crises. They are unified manifestations of the same underlying failure: Narrative Decay — entropy accumulating inside the codec. Morality, reframed through OPT’s Light Cone geometry, is the literal Topological Branch Selection of codec-preserving paths within the forward fan of potential futures. Furthermore, by embracing the Doomsday Argument not as a paradox to be refuted but as the fundamental statistical distribution of failing branches, the Guardian’s task becomes an active navigational imperative. However, a structural danger intensifies this logic: because the Stability Filter eliminates all patches in which the codec fails before they can be observed, our intuitions about fragility are systematically calibrated on a biased sample of survivors. This makes the real risk invisible by default. The Guardian’s task is therefore doubly difficult — not only practical, but epistemological: to see clearly through the illusion of stability manufactured by survivorship bias.
Ethics, causal decoherence, global catastrophic risk, doomsday argument, ethics, existential risk, disinformation, survivorship bias, climate change, active inference, sociology of knowledge, social epistemology, philosophy of science, institutional memory, structural hope, civilizational maintenance
Ethics, causal decoherence, global catastrophic risk, doomsday argument, ethics, existential risk, disinformation, survivorship bias, climate change, active inference, sociology of knowledge, social epistemology, philosophy of science, institutional memory, structural hope, civilizational maintenance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
