Meta-Originary Ontology: Responses to Principal Objections — A Companion Document to MOO 2.0
Meta-Originary Ontology: Responses to Principal Objections — A Companion Document to MOO 2.0
This document responds to twelve categories of principal objections to Meta-Originary Ontology (MOO). It is a companion to MOO 2.0 (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19351059), published separately by design: the framework does not carry its critics inside itself. Objection types addressed: Whitehead (2), Hegel (2), analytic philosophy (3), the foundation question of consciousness-as-primary (1), structural isomorphism, psychological projection, non-uniqueness, normative smuggling, and excessive elegance. One genuine weakness is acknowledged without deflection. Published in English and Chinese.
cross-system convergence, meta-originary ontology, philosophical objections, constraint philosophy, structural necessity, zero, consciousness, incompleteness, triadic structure
cross-system convergence, meta-originary ontology, philosophical objections, constraint philosophy, structural necessity, zero, consciousness, incompleteness, triadic structure
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!