Comparative Analysis of Anamnesis and Urodynamic Findings in Patients with Urinary Incontinence Teymur Bornaun 1* Academic Editor: Firstname Lastname Received: date Revised: date Accepted: date Published: date Citation: To be added by editorial staff during production. Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Submitted for possible open access publication under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul University Health Sciences Istanbul Bagcilar Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul 34200, Turkey * Correspondence: teymurbornaun1@gmail.com Featured Application The findings of this study may support clinicians in improving the diagnostic approach to urinary incontinence by integrating patient anamnesis with urodynamic testing. Understanding the relationship between clinical history and objective urodynamic findings can help optimize patient evaluation, reduce unnecessary diagnostic procedures, and facilitate more personalized treatment strategies in women with urinary incontinence. Abstract This research aims to compare anamnesis and urodynamic findings in diagnosing urinary incontinence and assess the diagnostic utility of patient histories. Urinary incontinence, defined as involuntary urine leakage in women, poses medical, hygienic, and social challenges. It can originate from various causes and manifests both as a symptom, reported by the patient, and as a sign, observable by others. Diagnosis typically involves laboratory procedures, including urodynamic testing. The study juxtaposes diagnoses derived from patient histories with those from urodynamic evaluations, utilizing patient files as the primary data source. Findings indicate a notable correlation between historical and urodynamic diagnoses. Nonetheless, discrepancies were observed in some cases, suggesting the need for tailored evaluations for each patient. The research underscores the importance of integrating both anamnesis and urodynamic data in the urinary incontinence diagnostic process. It highlights the necessity of a patient-specific approach to enhance treatment outcomes and suggests that this study could pave the way for further investigations in this field.