
Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is widely used as a minimally invasive diagnostic technique for evaluating lesions across multiple organ systems. Histopathology remains the gold standard for definitive diagnosis. Understanding the concordance between FNAC and histopathology is critical to determine the reliability of cytological diagnosis. Objective: To evaluate the concordance between FNAC and histopathological diagnosis across various organ systems and estimate pooled diagnostic accuracy through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted for studies published between 2000 and 2025 assessing FNAC–histopathology correlation. Studies reporting sensitivity, specificity, or concordance rates were included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio were estimated using a random-effects model. Results: Forty-two studies involving 18,750 patients across multiple organ systems were included. The pooled sensitivity of FNAC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88–0.94) and pooled specificity was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94–0.98). The overall concordance rate between FNAC and histopathology was 92.3%. Highest concordance was observed in thyroid and breast lesions. Conclusion: FNAC demonstrates high diagnostic concordance with histopathology across multiple organ systems and remains a reliable first-line diagnostic modality.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
