Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Report . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Verification and Validation of Ecological Models: Techniques for Credible Predictions in Biomedical Research

Authors: ecology science;

Verification and Validation of Ecological Models: Techniques for Credible Predictions in Biomedical Research

Abstract

This comprehensive review examines the critical processes of verification, validation, and uncertainty quantification within the context of ecological and biophysical modeling, specifically focusing on their relevance to biomedical research and pharmaceutical development. The article establishes a foundational distinction between verification, which checks the internal mathematical and computational correctness of a model, and validation, which assesses its external accuracy and real-world applicability. To bridge the gap between these processes, the text introduces the evaludation framework, an iterative approach that integrates continuous assessment throughout the entire model development lifecycle. A central component of the discussion is the Context of Use, a defining statement that dictates the specific role, scope, and boundaries of a model. This concept is operationalized through the ASME V&V-40 standard, which employs a risk-informed credibility assessment framework. By evaluating model influence and decision consequence, this standard helps researchers determine the appropriate level of validation rigor required for specific applications. The article also explores the philosophical underpinnings of validation, contrasting data-driven positivist approaches with usefulness-focused relativist perspectives, and advocates for a pragmatic synthesis. Practical challenges in model development are addressed, including the mitigation of missing data through advanced imputation methods like K-Nearest Neighbors and Random Forest, as well as strategies for managing deep parameter uncertainty via sensitivity analysis and Bayesian inference. Furthermore, the text provides a detailed comparative analysis of regulatory validation frameworks from the United States Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. While both agencies prioritize patient safety and product quality, they exhibit distinct structural and documentation expectations. By synthesizing these diverse methodologies, standards, and regulatory requirements, the article equips scientists and drug development professionals with the essential tools and protocols needed to build robust, credible, and globally compliant computational models. Source: https://www.ecologysci.com/posts/verification-and-validation-of-ecological-models-techniques-for-credible-predictions-in-biomedical-research

Keywords

Context of Use, Biomedical Research, ASME V&V-40, ASME V&V-40, Validation, Verification, Uncertainty Quantification, Evaludation, Ecological Models

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green