Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
External research report
Data sources: ZENODO
Zenodo
Claim

11-Speed vs 12-Speed MTB Drivetrains: Efficiency, Friction Loss, and 5-Year Cost Analysis

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right External research report Under curationPublisher:Zenodo
Authors: ravello joo, carlos eduardo;

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.19229331

11-Speed vs 12-Speed MTB Drivetrains: Efficiency, Friction Loss, and 5-Year Cost Analysis

Abstract

Physics-based analysis of drivetrain efficiency comparing 11 and 12-speed MTB systems. Applies Spicer and Lodge friction models, Monte Carlo simulation, and 5-year cost projection. Data shows <0.5% energy difference in real conditions. Published by BikeLab Studio, Trujillo, Peru.

Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback