
Abstract Students differ in how they use their abilities and approach learning tasks, and these differences may help explain variation in mathematics performance. This study examined the relationships among thinking styles, triarchic intelligence, and mathematics performance among students enrolled in a university mathematics course. Using a correlational-predictive design, data were obtained from 92 randomly selected students from the College of Engineering and Technology of a state university in the Philippines. Thinking styles were measured using a Thinking Styles Questionnaire, triarchic intelligence was assessed through a revised Triarchic Intelligence Inventory, and mathematics performance was evaluated using a researcher-developed test covering achievement and problem-solving skills. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multiple linear regression. Results showed that several thinking styles were significantly associated with triarchic intelligence dimensions. Profile-specific regression analyses further revealed that selected thinking styles significantly predicted achievement and problem-solving performance among students with particular dominant intelligence profiles. The findings suggest that students’ stylistic preferences and ability patterns may provide useful bases for designing more responsive mathematics instruction and learner support in higher education.
Thinking styles, triarchic intelligence, mathematics performance, mathematics course, correlational-predictive study.
Thinking styles, triarchic intelligence, mathematics performance, mathematics course, correlational-predictive study.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
